Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Paranormal Activity: Grassroots scaring through suspense











This is the trailer to the first Paranormal Activity film. It is a film that is very minimalist in terms of special effects with the blowing of the bed sheet to give the impression that someone is there, relying on the fear of the unknown at a time when you are most vulnerable, when you are sleeping (Schwartz 2009a). The film was marketed in a very unique way as it allowed people to request it to be shown in their hometown by voting on the paranormal activity website, which is shown at the end of the trailer (ibid.). The film was in fact made in October 2006 in seven days and had been shown at festivals for a couple of years including at Screamfest in LA in 2007 (Schwartz 2009b). Oren Peli, the director struggled to get distribution but did get help from Steven Spielberg, who infamous ly had to turn off the film at night and resume it the next day (ibid.). Their decision to conduct a grassroots effort to build popularity for the film and gain a national release showed how important it was to gain the affections of horror fans, particularly college students. This explains why the initial release was in limited to 13 college towns (ibid.)




This is a poster for Paranormal Activity. It shows how it engages with its audience by giving them the power to determine where the film is shown to build popularity and word of mouth. It also uses a still of the recording of Micah and Katie, the San Diego couple trying to sleep, showing how the fear of th unknown and suggestive actions are used to scare people. It also tackles the issue of surveillance in post 9/11 culture expressed earlier in the Saw post about how it can be used see to things you should not be able to see and giving the film a dose of realism rather than fantastical violence to scare.


This really shows how significant social media is recent popular culture, that through Twitter, Facebook and websites like the paranormal activity demand it site horror movie consumers are given a medium where they can express their desires and opinions. For the Horror film this helps engage the audience further, which has always been important for their success. By including horror fans in the process of the film becoming popular it shows the importance the cultural consumer has of determining what is popular, especially when the filmmakers give them that power (Hampp 2010).


In addition the film shows that you do not have to rely on violence and gore to scare and shows why we picked this film to represent the other end of the spectrum of horror movies. There is a sense that this is because audiences are now smarter, leading to a series of horror films that are now smarter and possibly spelling the end for torture porn (Hicks 2009). Tony Hicks of the Oakland Tribune argues that this is because people have become increasingly desensitized to gore and Winston Dixon, the author of "A History of Horror" arguably credits Paranormal activity with bringing an end to the popularity of torture movies (ibid.).


Do you agree that the new trend in horror movies is to make smart horror with suspense? Do you think torture porn is over? What do you think of the grassroots element of the film's popularity? Is this a new trend in horror movies?


References


Hampp, Andrew. 2010. "Paranormal Activity" Wins by listening to "Fans Demands." Advertising Age 81 (8). Retrieved from Film and Television Literature Index.






Peli, Oren. 2007. Paranormal Activity. San Diego: Paramount Pictures.


Schwartz, Missy. 2009a. 5 Things you should know about Paranormal Activity. Entertainment Weekly, 2 October. Retrieved from Film and Television Literature Index.


Scwartz, Missy. 2009b. A Shocking Hit. Entertainment Weekly, 6 November. Retrieved from Film and Television Literature Index.











Monday, April 18, 2011

Film Journal International Review- Paranormal Activity

This review by Kevin Lally, rehashes the incredible low-budget success of Paranormal Activity as well as its creative use of marketing to attract a bigger audience. Yet he also claims that Paranormal Activity successfully delivers "what the Blair Witch Project never did, but its achingly slow buildup is a test" of the audience's patience (Lally 2010).


Film Journal International Review- Saw

This review by Bruce Feld criticizes the believability of Saw, commenting that nothing from the makeup to the script seem genuine or real. Feld calls the script "cliche ridden" and the plot irrational and at times "ridiculous" (Feld 2010).

TIME article on Saw

"Saw came and conquered" by Richard Corliss of TIME magazine lends an interesting look into the audience of horror movies. Corliss explains that in the year 2006, 10 out of 18 horror film released were the weekends top grossers. And the main demographic for these movies? Teenage boys.

Corliss also mentions how horror films almost always cost less and make more in relation to their big-budget production counterparts. For instance, he notes that Final Destination 3, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning and The Hills Have Eyes all trumped Clint Eastwood's Flags of Our Fathers on the opening weekend.


Sunday, April 17, 2011

History of Meaning

http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/06/07/philosophy_of_horror_movies

Throughout the history of horror movies, the issues faced in these films are often reflections of the social context surrounding the creation of these movies. An example of this is movies with monsters that are a metaphor for communist threat in the 1950's; these movies can also represent how we feel about war, terrorism, or other problems (Rogers, 2010).

The appeal of "Paranormal Activity" is because of the "up close and personal" feel that it has to it. The viewer feels as if they are the ones experiencing the horror. Similar movies of this nature include, "Open Water," or even "District 9." The viewer feels more connected to the events in the film because of how the movies seem to incorporate everyday events and show the people living their lives like any other person.

Power Dynamics in Slasher Films

http://nymag.com/movies/features/15622/

"As potential victims, we fear serial killers, yet we also seek to identify with their power" (Edelstein, 2006). This is one perspective as to why movies like "Saw" are so popular. Viewers rarely get to deal with sadism or masochism on a daily basis nor do viewers ever get insight into criminal minds. The beauty of slasher films is that viewers get to put themselves in the position of the torturer and the tortured.



"Shockumentaries"

http://horror.about.com/od/horrormoviesubgenres/a/exploitation_2.htm

http://www.weirdwildrealm.com/f-ingagi.html

Paranormal Activity is definitely not the first movie of its' kind. This website brings to attention the first movie from the genre of "shockumentaries," Ingagi. Ingagi first came out in 1931 and was originally shown as what viewers thought was a documentary about explorers in the African Congo who researched human and animal sacrifice and bestiality between women and gorillas (Harris). The shock value was tremendous as people could not believe their eyes as to how authentic this looked on screen. However, it was later revealed as a hoax. As it turned out, the characters in the documentary were entirely fictional and the footage was a montage of borrowed footage from other movies and documentaries (Paghat).Due to the popularity of Ingagi, it sparked the creation of a multitude of other "shockumentaries" such as Mondo Cane and Faces of Death. It is often argued that the popularity of the these films is due to the high shock value.

It should also be noted that Ingagi reflected the anxieties of American society at the time. Since Ingagi debuted in 1931, it deals with issues about "savages" and people from foreign lands. During this time, novels such as "Tarzan of the Great Apes" were very popular because they dealt with the concept of man versus a savage beast (Paghat).